Halloween Horror Marathon 2025

Talk about the latest movies and video releases here!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Monterey Jack
Posts: 10637
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
Location: Walpole, MA

Halloween Horror Marathon 2025

#1 Post by Monterey Jack »

Muahahahahahahaha. :)

Halloween Horror Marathon '12

Halloween Horror Marathon '13

Halloween Horror Marathon '14

Halloween Horror Marathon '15

Halloween Horror Marathon '16

Halloween Horror Marathon '17

Halloween Horror Marathon '18

Halloween Horror Marathon '19

Halloween Horror Marathon '20

Halloween Horror Marathon '21

Halloween Horror Marathon '22

Halloween Horror Marathon '23

Halloween Horror Marathon '24



INT., MOVIE THEATER BALCONY, DAY[?]:

TWO MEN sit watching the screen, clad in identical outfits of dark blue suit jackets and tan slacks. Seated to the left is GENE SISKEL, film critic. Tall and lanky, with a dome bereft of hair (but framed by sides). To his right is ROGER EBERT, also of the same profession, considerably shorter, considerably rounder, bespectacled. On the screen, a scene from a cheapjack HORROR MOVIE plays out, a SCREAMING WOMAN, clad in torn, skimpy clothing, cowering in the corner of a room contained within a squalid cabin in the woods as a MASKED KILLER, holding a machete dripping with grue, advances towards her, as OMINOUS MUSIC crescendos on the soundtrack. Her scream is abruptly cut off as the machete descends in a whistling arc, burying itself, we assume, in her cranium. [the offending moment is, naturally, only left to the viewer's imagination, this being a widely syndicated program offering reviews of the week's new cinema offerings]

[We cut to alternating, medium close-ups of the two men as they introduce themselves to the audience at home]

ROGER: [not meaning it] Charming. Hello, I'm Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun Times.

GENE: And I'm Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune, and, as the clip we just watched illustrates, it's October 1st, and you all know what that means, another month of this kind of sensationalistic horror trash is about to unspool in multiplexes across the country.

ROGER: Gene and I have been adamant in our deep dislike for these kinds of 'films', yet a plumber isn't enthused about clearing a clogged toilet, and yet needs to earn a steady paycheck, so we're gonna hold our noses and dive into another round of these detestable, unimaginative slasher flicks.

GENE: I'm of the same mind as Roger. Why do studios keep polluting the minds of our young moviegoers with this stuff? There's no authentic suspense, no relatable or likeable characters, just a rash of mindless decapitations and disembowelment, all done with the state-of-the-art in makeup effects to make them as convincing as possible.

ROGER: [interjecting] But to what effect, Gene? Even the teenagers who flock to these movies have seen this all done before, over and over, with little variation. The same masked killers gutting the latest batch of photogenic but bland young people. Is this what passes for entertainment these days?

GENE: [makes an exasperated gesture with his hands] You've got me, Rog. I can't remember the last horror movie I saw that generated any authentic suspense or eerie mood, they just play the same tired shock music to goose the audience that, by now, should see it coming a mile away. Long gone are the days when we had an Alfred Hitchcock who could deliver suspense with a modicum of wit, style or sophistication.

ROGER: It's a distressing state of affairs, Gene, but, as I said before, it's a job, and somebody's got to do it, so here we go. [rolls up jacket sleeves, which immediately fall down to cover his forearms again] First off, we have...

Suddenly, the MOVIE THEATER SCREEN, which had been frozen in the split-instant before impact, flickers and goes dead.

ROGER: [not missing a beat] ...nothing!

[Gene chuckles]

ROGER: [breaking character] We seem to be experiencing some technical difficulties, so, you want anything from the concession stand, Gene?

GENE: [deadpan] If there's anything left after your last visit, Rog.

Roger laughs good-naturedly. These two have been ribbing each other for years.

ROGER: [Calling off-camera] Any ETA on getting the projection back on? I was hoping to get this segment in the can before we broke for lunch.

There is an OMINOUS SILENCE. Both critics make faces as they look off-camera.

GENE: The hell...?

Roger gets up.

ROGER: [muttering] I swear, if this is some kind of prank...

Roger walks off-screen right as Gene looks about in displeased confusion. A half-minute later, Roger returns and sits down again.

ROGER: [irritated] The door to the lobby's locked.

GENE: Oh, you are KIDDING me...

Gene gets up and tries the exit door to the lobby on his side, finding that it, too, is locked. He slams an open hand on the door.

GENE: [angry] HEY, what's the deal?! This wasn't funny on April 1st, and it's not funny now! Hello...?!

Gene goes back to his seat and settles down with an annoyed grunt. Suddenly, the blank screen starts to flicker. Both critics look upwards as the screen shows something inexplicable. A DOLL is sitting posed on a small, three-wheeled bicycle. The pasty-white doll's face has RED SPIRALS decorating both cheeks and the same crimson shade smeared across its lips. A shock of black hair matches the NATTY TUXEDO sporting a red bowtie. The background, what they can make out of it, looks like something out of the film clip they were just watching, an anonymously scuzzy, dankly lit room piled high with random rickrack and festooned with dangling cobwebs. Suddenly, the puppet's head turns to look directly at the camera. Despite being inured to such hackneyed visuals in the hundreds of horror films they've been forced to sit through over the years in their chosen profession, both critics suppress a momentary quiver of unease. Then, the puppet's crudely-serrated jaw starts to clack up and down and it begins to "speak".

PUPPET: Greetings, Mr. Ebert and Mr. Siskel. I'm afraid your usual filming session has been hijacked for the time being.

Roger and Gene exchange a bemused look.

PUPPET: [continues] My name is Jigsaw, and I can no longer sit by and allow your slander of the horror genre to continue unchallenged.

GENE: [addressing the screen] What *is* this? What have you done with our filming crew?

PUPPET/JIGSAW: Have no fears on that account. All have been stashed away without injury, and will be released when our business has been concluded. After all, they are innocent puppets in this little game, and do not deserve to be punished for merely doing a job.

ROGER: [addressing the screen] This is all very amusing, but I assure you, whoever you are, that this prank has gone quite far enough. If you'll be so kind as to unlock the doors...

JIGSAW: [interrupting] I'm afraid that is out of the question. You two have been charged of the crime of denigrating an unfairly maligned film genre, offering little evidence why it is so beneath your exalted standards.

GENE: Oh, I think we've reviewed enough of this swill to have earned a right to call it out for what it is.

ROGER: Precisely! I'm not saying that *all* horror films are bad, but the push towards more extreme levels of sadism and gore -- without well-crafted suspense -- is doing a number of the psyches of impressionable children and teenagers. They deserve to experience vicarious thrills, no doubt, but films like what we're reviewing today are achieving said thrills with little sense of style or humor.

JIGSAW: You condemn such films sight-unseen.

GENE: [smug] Well, you don't have to place your hand on a red-hot stove burner to understand it will burn you.

JIGSAW: Who assigned you two, and those of your ilk, the arbiters of cinematic decorum and taste? What's wrong with gore, nudity and bad taste?

ROGER: [defensive] Hey, I gave four stars to Dawn Of The Dead!

JIGSAW: A stopped clock is right twice a day, Mr. Ebert.

GENE: So what's your angle, uhhhh, "Jigsaw"? Why have you trapped us here?

JIGSAW: Since you two are such seasoned critics, and know all of the cliches of the horror genre inside and out, we're going to play a little game for the next 24 hours. Soon, I will unspool a series of carefully curated horror films. Pay close attention to them all! All will contain clues that will allow you to proceed to the next rounds.

ROGER: And if we don't want to play along, Mr. Jigsaw?

Suddenly a pair of IRON MANACLES snap into place around Roger and Gene's ankles, trapping them in their seats. Gene CRIES OUT as a flap of skin gets painfully caught between the remorseless steel pincers. A small red spot begins to spread across his lower leg.

ROGER: [alarmed] Gene!

Roger attempts to reach out for his injured colleague, but the manacles prevent him from rising from his seat. He emits a DEFIANT SNARL as he reaches down and attempts to prise the manacles open.

JIGSAW: Those manacles are made out of high-tensile steel. Nothing short of a blowtorch could open them, and I'm sure your ankles would not appreciate the heat it would require to melt them open.

GENE: [tears of pain leaking from the corners of his eyes] DAMN YOU!!! What do you WANT from us?!

JIGSAW: If the two of you desire your freedom, you will require this. [the puppet, being operated by someone offscreen, holds up an arm. Held in one hand is an enticingly shiny SILVER KEY]

JIGSAW: [continues] All you need to do to be given this key is to watch the films that are shortly to begin. *Study* thern, not only for or the "subtext" and "metaphor" you critics seems to think is more important than pure storytelling drive, but also to answer the trivia questions that will follow each presentation. For every answer you collectively get right, this key will get closer and closer. For every answer you get wrong, well...

The manacles suddenly, painfully CONSTRICT, causing both Roger and Gene to shout in pain. They stay painfully pinched, for several seconds, before returning to their original size. Both critics heave sighs of relief.

JIGSAW: You're about to get a crash course in some of the best -- and worst -- horror films ever made. The snooty heights of "Elevated Horror", the dregs of low-budget splatter cinema, and everything in-between. I hope you hit the restroom before the door shut, because the movies will not stop for any reason...

Roger contemplates his half-empty soda and popcorn containers sourly.

JIGSAW: [continues] ...because it's time for...The 2025 Horror Movie Marathon.

Image

~~~~~~~

This year's marathon is dedicated to Tony Todd, Olivia Hussey, Lalo Schifrin, Mark Snow, Alf Clausen, Michael Madsen, Terence Stamp, Lorna Raver, Joe Don Baker (Mitchell...!!!), Michelle Trachtenberg, Val Kilmer, Scott Spiegel, David Lynch, George Wendt, Gene Hackman, Priscilla Pointer, Ed Gale and Harris Yulin.

User avatar
Monterey Jack
Posts: 10637
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
Location: Walpole, MA

Re: Halloween Horror Marathon 2025

#2 Post by Monterey Jack »

Farewell and adieu to summer...

1.) Jaws (1975): 11/10

Image

What can possibly be said about Steven Spielberg's breakout 1975 blockbuster after fifty years? It remains one of the greatest cinematic thrills rides of all time, with the then-27-year-old wunderkind firing on all creative cylinders in bringing Peter Benchley's bestseller -- about the small New England island community of Amity's key summer tourist season being brought to a screaming halt by the ravening predations of a 25-foot Great White Shark and how the town's aquaphobic police chief (Roy Scheider), a bright, eager ichthyologist (Richard Dreyfuss) and a blunt, crusty sea cap'n (Robert Shaw) band together to repel the menace and put the town's businesses back on a paying basis -- to terrifying life. This is one of those miraculous films where everything clicks, from the leading troika's prickly and immediate chemistry to Spielberg's innate sense of camera placement, movement and knowing exactly when to key the shocks and laughs like a seasoned symphonic conductor to John Williams' brilliant, Oscar-winning musical score (buttressing his [in]famous thumping low-end ostinato signaling the shark's hovering presence -- one of the most ingeniously simple pieces of screw-tightening fear music ever conceived -- with ebullient sea shanteys illustrating the sheer joy of the chase), it's a movie that remains as fresh and frightening as it did unspooling in cinemas for the first time half-a-century(!) ago, and seeing it large and in charge in its current theatrical run is a treat. Worth raising a glass to ("Okay, we'll drink our legs...!") to celebrate five decades of ruining beach holidays as this summer enters its last few weeks.

User avatar
Monterey Jack
Posts: 10637
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
Location: Walpole, MA

Re: Halloween Horror Marathon 2025

#3 Post by Monterey Jack »

2.) Jaws 2 (1978): 8.5/10

Image

Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water, Universal sequelized Steven Spielberg's massive box office blockbuster, and if you haven't seen it in a while, you'll be surprised how well it holds up. Roy Scheider returns as police Chief Martin Brody, still left rattled by the events of the first movie and the first one to cry wolf when a series of disappearances in the waters around the island community of Amity leads him to belIeve another Great White Shark is cruising for some summer chow. The town selectmen (led by Murray Hamilton) scoff at the idea, thinking Brody's suffering from a form of PTSD, but as the body count continues to climb, Brody is forced to face his fears and tackle another fishy foe as his sons Michael and Shawn find themselves amongst a pack of imperiled teens left adrift on the wreckage of their sailboats to fend for themselves.

Jaws 2 was an early example of a hotly-anticipated sequel that suffered from severe growing pains, with original director John Hancock (Let's Scare Jessica To Death) let go from the production after a few weeks' filming (little of his footage made the final cut) and Jeannot Szwarc (Somewhere In Time) brought in to mop up and steer the film away from Hancock's original, darker vision (some of which you can ascertain from Hank Searls' novelization) and capture a more spirited tone more in line with the original. The core cast of teenagers are more "types" than fleshed-out characters, but they're far more appealing and likable than the hateful ciphers that would typify the slasher cinema that would originate just a few months after this film's release date with Halloween and its many inferior, crude sequels and ripoffs (those movies would rarely feature a moment as poignant as one girl giving a heartfelt plea for deliverance as the rest of the group look on in reverent silence). And Scheider, despite only doing the movie as part of a contractual obligation with Universal and who did not want to make it, nevertheless shows a great deal of professionalism by not half-assing it, delivering a more wounded take on Brody as he begins to crack under the pressure of a threat to the populace that only he can see (there's a warm, emotional moment as Brody, after shooting his gun off at the beach a what turns out to be simply a school of bluefish, gathers the shell casings scattered across the sand in quiet humiliation, as his younger son, Shawn, silently assists him).

While Szwarc shows a surprising tact with the smaller, human moments of the story, the audience clearly is craving the thrills of Spielberg's film, and he delivers on that level with terse efficiency, the shark setpieces delivering the creeping, anticipatory dread and slashing shocks with maximum expertise (the shark -- left scarred by an encounter with a exploding pleasure boat early in the film -- chowing down on a floating coast guard helicopter is a memorable setpiece). And returning composer John Williams is the true MVP here, retaining the unforgettable shark motif from the original and fashioning a more bright, youthful flair for the sailing sequences with the teen characters, with gorgeous, infectious melodies that bring the film to life. In a career full of franchise pictures, this remains one of Williams' best sequel efforts, with "End Title, End Cast" being one of the most beautiful cues in his vast repertoire. You could easily argue that this film is deeply "unnecessary", but as far as mercenary "Just for the money" sequels go, this is on the high end of such efforts, and two increasingly awful sequels that followed unfortunately sullied this movie's reputation as more of the same. Give it a shot, though, and you'll discover a superior shocker that's obviously not a patch on Spielberg's original, yet is still far better-crafted than it had to be.

User avatar
Paul MacLean
Posts: 7621
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: New York

Re: Halloween Horror Marathon 2025

#4 Post by Paul MacLean »

A few weeks ago I showed Jaws to a couple of friends of mine in their early 30s who had never seen it. They got a real kick out of it.

And Ben Gardner's corpse gets 'em every time! 8)

User avatar
Monterey Jack
Posts: 10637
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
Location: Walpole, MA

Re: Halloween Horror Marathon 2025

#5 Post by Monterey Jack »

3.) The Conjuring: Last Rites (2025): 7/10

Image

The latest -- and purportedly last -- film in WB's profitable "Conjuringverse" franchise finds paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren (Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga) brought out of premature retirement (due in large part to Ed's worsening heart condition) circa 1986 to investigate the "Pittsburgh Poltergeist", a manifestation of concentrated evil (connected to an ornate mirror that was a key conduit in one of their earliest cases) that's been terrorizing the large Smurl family, who are at their wit's end. Ed, Lorraine, and their now grown daughter, Judy (Mia Tomlinson) have to band together to repel the violent spirit, who was present at Judy's birth (she was stillborn for approximately a minute before miraculously reviving) and is apparently looking for a little payback, desiring the spirit of Judy that was denied him 22 years earlier.

The Conjuring movies (and their various spin-offs) have offered up a smorgasbord of well-worn genre cliches given a fresh polish -- at least in the first two efforts directed by series originator James Wan -- but Last Rites, reasonably well-crafted as it is, can't help but feel somewhat canned and routine. The best aspect of the film, as always, are the endearing characterizations by Wilson and Farmiga as the Warrens, the devoutly religious yet still warmly amorous couple who like the fright-flick equivalent of a pair of well-worn but comfy slippers. They ground even the hoariest scary-movie tropes with a lived-in chemistry that one can only get after living with these characters for the past dozen years(!). That said, returning director Michael Chaves (who directed the previous film in the series and two of the varied spin-offs) lacks the roving-camera finesse of Wan, the ability to time the camera movements, edits and sound design and musical strings into a pleasurable miasma of hovering dread. His direction is perfectly functional, but he cannot tune the symphony to the same fine pitch as Wan. While this is certainly not as blandly routine as something like The Nun II (which was nun II scary), it's probably best that this brings this series of films to a close (with an satisfyingly emotional wrap-up with cameos from previous players), because there's not much blood left to be squeezed from this particular stone.

User avatar
Paul MacLean
Posts: 7621
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: New York

Re: Halloween Horror Marathon 2025

#6 Post by Paul MacLean »

Poltergeist (8.5/10)

Tonight's viewing choice for my friends to whom I showed Jaws a few weeks ago.

This movie is a classic -- and it holds-up today. Yes, there are things that "date" it (the National Anthem sign-off opening, landline phones, the cars, the home decor) yet the film doesn't feel like a "relic". It's hard to explain, but it brings you back the time it was made without feeling "old".

It's a film that works brilliantly on multiple levels -- horror movie, engaging family drama, and (at times) side-splittingly funny comedy. The film's reliance on practical effetcs is also tremendously refreshing in our age of formulaic CGI. It's gorgeously (and imaginatively) shot by Matthew F. Leonetti, and again the "special effect" at the climax in the kids' bedroom was largely an on-set lighting effect devised by Leonetti (with very little post-production optical embellishment). And we all agree Jerry Goldsmith's score is one of his best -- it's a shame he and Spielberg did not do more work together.

And I still wonder about the directorial authorship of this movie. Poltergeist has Spielberg's thumbprint all over it -- in the performances (especially the kids' performances), the camera moves, the ingenious on-set effects, the warm and sentimental evocation of family, etc. It certainly doesn't bring to mind the director of Lifeforce.

It is also, for me, a nostalgic trigger to memories of the greatest year for movies a budding cinephile could ever hope for -- 1982 -- the same year we got E.T., Star Trek II, Blade Runner, The Road Warrior, Conan The Barbarian, The Thing, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Tron, First Blood, The Dark Crystal, etc.

esteban miranda
Posts: 77
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:21 pm

Re: Halloween Horror Marathon 2025

#7 Post by esteban miranda »

I refuse to believe this was released 43 years ago.
I remember seeing this when it first came to the theater...
Fun movie, great score.

Post Reply